Магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике, планировании и оценке эффективности лечения рака шейки и тела матки
Диссертация
Использование в протоколе МРТ у пациенток с крупными экзофитными опухолями шейки матки методики двойного контрастирования привело к повышению показателей информативности метода по сравнению со стандартной методикой, при этом чувствительность увеличилась на 19%, специфичность на 9%, точность на 13%, прогностическая ценность положительного и отрицательного результатов на 14% и 10%, соответственно… Читать ещё >
Список литературы
- Антипов В.А. Радикальная абдоминальная трахелэктомия (показания, методологические аспекты и результаты лечения) //Диссертация на соискание ученой степени доктора медицинских наук Москва, 2011- 251 С.
- Антипов В.А. Рак шейки матки //Глава в книге Клинические рекомендации. Онкология. Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, С. Л. Дарьяловой 2009- С. 642−656.
- Ашрафян Л.А. с соавт. Диагностические критерии и факторы прогноза эффективности неоадъювантной химиотерапии местно-распространенного рака шейки матки (IIB-IIIB стадии) //Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы — 2007- № 4, С. 63−71.
- Березовская Т.П., Дьячков A.A., Валькова В. Н. Магнитно-резонансная томография при опухолях матки и придатков //"Правда Севера", Архангельск 2002- 111 С.
- Бохман Я.В. Руководство по онкогинекологии. //С-Пб: 2002- 544 С.
- Винокуров В.Л. Рак шейки матки, тела матки и яичников: итоги и перспективы исследований в ЦНИРРИ МИНЗДРАВА РФ. //Вопросы онкологии 2003- Т. 49. № 5., С. 656−662.
- Востров А.Н. Комплексная ультразвуковая диагностика рака эндометрия //Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата медицинских наук -Москва, 2002- 126 С.
- Гусейнов К.Д. Оценка эффективности использования лекарственной терапии в комбинированном лечении больных раком шейки матки 1Ь2-III стадий. //Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата медицинских наук С-Петербург, 2003- С. 116.
- Егорова E.B. Рентгеновская компьютерная томография в планировании и контроле лучевой терапии рака матки и яичников. //Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени кандидата медицинских наук -Москва, 2004- С.ЗО.
- П.Козаченко В. П. Клиническая онкогинекология. //Руководство для врачей. Москва: Медицина 2005- С. 374.
- Коржевская Е.В., Козаченко В. П., Паяниди Ю. Г. Новые классификации злокачественных опухолей женских половых органов (FIGO и TNM) //Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы. 2010- № 2, С. 71−78.
- Кудреватых Е.В. Магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике и оценке результатов комплексного лечения рака шейки матки. //Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата медицинских наук Москва, 2011- 110 С.
- Мёллер Т.Б., Райф. Э. Перевод с английского под общей редакцией Г. Е. Труфанова. Атлас секционной анатомии человека. На примере KT и МРТ-срезов в 3-х томах //Москва: «МЕД-пресс-информ», 2009- Т. II Внутренние органы, С. 178−189.
- Михайлова Е.В., Березовская Т. П. Сравнительная характеристика результатов клинического и МРТ-стадирования распространенных форм рака шейки матки. //материалы научно-практической конференции «Невский радиологический форум» С.-Петербург, 2005- С. 10−11.
- Морхов К.Ю., Кузнецов В. В. Рак шейки матки //Лекции по онкогинекологии Давыдова М. И., Кузнецова B.B. М.: «МЕДпресс-информ», 2009- С. 199−225.
- Немчушкина В. М., Кузнецов В. В., Баринов В. В. с соавт. Рак тела матки //Лекции по онкогинекологии под общей редакцией Давыдова М. И., Кузнецова B.B. М.: «МЕДпресс-информ», 2009- С. 226−254.
- Новикова Е.Г., Антипов В. А., Рак шейки матки //Руководство по онкологии Москва: МИА, 2008- С. 518−528.
- Новикова Е.Г., Антипов В. А., Чулкова О. В. с соавт. Опухоли женских половых органов //Онкология. Национальное руководство под редакцией акад. РАМН В. И. Чиссова, акад. РАН и РАМН Н. И. Давыдова. М.:Гэотар-медиа, 2008- С. 812−827.
- Под редакцией П.Е. С. Пальмера. Руководство по ультразвуковой диагностике. //Всемирная организация здравоохранения М: «Медицина», 2000- 334 С.
- Прошин А. А. Магнитно-резонансная томография в определении факторов прогноза и выявлении рецидивов рака шейки матки после лучевого и химиолучевого лечения: Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени канд. мед. наук. Обнинск, 2011- 18 С.
- Ронина Е.А., Новикова Е. Г., Чулкова О. В. с соавт. Концепция органосохранного лечения в онкогинекологии //Практическая онкология. 2009- Т. 10, № 2, С. 86- 91.
- Сафронова О.Б. Комплексная лучевая диагностика распространенного рака шейки матки //Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата медицинских наук Санкт-Петербург, 2005- 99 С.
- Смит Дж.Р., Хейли Дж., Дель Приоре Г. Онкогинекологический атлас: классификация и определение стадии опухолей, принципы диагностики и лечения. //Перевод с английского под редакцией Е. Г. Новиковой Москва: МЕДпресс-информ — 2010- 105 С.
- Старинский В.В., Г.В. Петрова, О.П. Грецова. Эпидемиология злокачественных новообразований //Руководство по онкологии под редакцией В. И. Чиссова, Дарьяловой СЛ. Москва: МИА — 2008- С. 31−44.
- Хоружик С.А., Косенко И. А., Матылевич О. П. с соавт. Возможности МРТ в сгадировании рака шейки матки и оценке эффективности неоадьювантной химиотерапии //Онкологический журнал, 2010- Т.4, № 1, С. 54−60.
- Чиссов В.И., Старинский В. В., Петрова Г. В. с соавт. Состояние онкологической помощи населению Российской Федерацию. //Москва: РИИС ФИАН 2011- С. 28.
- Чулкова О.В., Новикова Е. Г. Рак тела матки //Руководство по онкологии Москва: МИА — 2008- С. 528−540.
- Akduman E.I., Momtahen A.J., Mahajann N. et al. Comparison between malignant and bening abdominal lymph nodes on diffusion-weighted imaging //Acad. Radiol., 2008- V.15, P. 641−646.
- American Joint Committee on Cancer. In: Greene F.L., Balch C.M., Page D.L. et al. Cancer Staging Manual, 6th end. //Chicago: Springer, 2002, P. 301.
- Beddy P., O’Neill A.C., Yamamoto A.K. et al. FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging //Radiographics. 2012 Jan-Feb- V.32, № 1, P. 241−254.
- Bipat S., Glas A.S., Van der Velden, Zwinderman A.H. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. //Gynecol. Oncol. 2003- V. 86, № 5, P. 31−37.
- Boss E.A., Barentsz J.O., Massuger L.F., Boonstra H. The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma. //Eur. Radiol. 2000- V. 10, № 2, P. 256−270.
- Cabrita S., Rodrigues H., Abreu R. et al. MRI in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma. //Eur. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008- V.29, № 2, P. 135−137.
- Carvalho J.P., Viana P., Anton C. et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to detect synchronous uterine endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma //Rare Tumors. 2012- V. 2, № 4, P. 1−19.
- Celik C., Ozdemir S., Kiresi D. et al. Evalution of cervical involvement in endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography, MRI and frozen section. //J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010 Apr- V. 30, № 3, P. 302−307.
- Chang Abu Freij M., Saleh H., Rawlins H. et al. The use of MRI for selecting patients with endometrial cancer and significant co-morbidities for vaginal hysterectomy. //Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2010 Jun- V.16, P. 35−38.
- Cho H., Kim Y.T., Kim J.H. Accuracy of preoperative tests in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: the importance of lymphadenectomy. //Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2010- V. 89, № 2, P. 175−81.
- Choi H.J., Kim S.H., Seo S. et al. MRI for Pretreatment Lymph Node Staging in Uterine Cervical Cancer. //American J. of Radiology. 2006- V. 187, P. 538−543.
- Choi S.H., Kim S.H., Choi H.J. Park B.K. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study. //Journal of comput. assist tomography. 2004- V.28, № 5, P. 620−627.
- Chung H.H. Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer? //Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. — 2007- Vol. 37, № 5, P. 370−375.
- Chung H.H., Kang S.B., Cho J.Y. et al. Accuracy of MRI for the prediction of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma. //Gynecol. Oncol. 2007 Mar- V.104, № 3, P. 654−659.
- DiSaia P.J., Creasman W.T. Clinical gynecologic oncology 7-th ed. //Mosby Elsevier — 2007- P.812.
- Downey K., deSouza N.M. et al. Imaging cervical cancer: recent advances and future directions //Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2011 Sep- V.23, № 5, P. 519−525.
- Duncan K.A. Drinkwater K.J., Frost C. et al. Staging cancer of the uterus: A national audit of MRI accuracy //Clin. Radiol. 2012 Jun- V.67, № 6, P. 523−530.
- FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines for gynecologic cancers //Int. J. Gynecol. Obst. — 2000- V.70, P. 207−312.
- Fujii S., Matsusue E., Kigawa J. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results //Eur. Radiol. 2008- V. 18, P. 384−389.
- Greco A., Mason P., Leung A.W.L., Dische S. et al. Staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: MRI surgical correlation. //Clin Radiol. 1989- V.40, P. 401−405.
- Han S.J., Lee E.J., Kim W.Y. et al. Value of sonogysterography in preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion for patiets with endometrial cancer. //J. ultrasound Med. 2010 Jun- V.29, № 6, P. 923−929.
- Han S.S., Lee S.H., Kim D.H. et al. Evaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. //Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2010- V. 89, № 2, P. 168−174.
- Hardesly L.A., Sumkin J.H., Hakim C., Johns C. The ability of helical CT to preoperatively stage cervical cancer. //Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001- V. 176, № 3, P. 603−606.
- Hori M., Kim T., Murakami T. et al. Uterine Cervical Carcinoma: Preoperative Staging with 3.0-T MR Imaging-Comparison with 1.5-T MR Imaging. //Radiology. 2009- V. 251, № 1, P. 96−104.
- Hricak H. MRI of the female pelvis: a review. //AJR. 2006- V.146, P. 11 151 122.
- Hricak H., Gatsonis C., Coakley F.V. et al. //Early Invasive Cervical Cancer: CT and MR Imaging in Preoperative Evaluation—ACRIN/GOG Comparative Study of Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Variability. //Radiology. 2007- V.245, № 2, P. 91−98.
- Hricak H., Husband J., Panicek D.M. Oncologic Imaging: Essentials of Reporting Common Cancers. //SAUNDERS, 2007- P. 306.
- Hricak H., Lacey C.G., Sandles L.G., Chang Y.C.F. et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. //Radiology. 1996- V.166, P. 623−631.
- Hricak H., Oguz A., Sala E. et al. Diagnostic imaging gynecology //Copyright Amirsys, 2007- P. 1−22.
- Hulse P., Carrington B. MRI manual of pelvic cancer. //Martin Dunitz Taylor & Francis group. London and New York, 2004- 256 P.
- Hwang J.H., Lee N.W., Lee K.W. et al. MRI for assessment of deep endometrial invasion for patients with endometrial carcinoma. //Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct- V. 49, № 5, P. 537−541.
- Ivanov S. Methods for preoperative and intraoperative evalution of the tumor infiltration and lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer (summarized own and foreing experience). //Akush. Ginecol. Sofiia. 2010- V. 49, № 4, P. 21−24.
- Janus C.L., Mendelson D.S., Moore S., Gendal E.S. et al. Staging of cervical carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. //Clin Imaging. 1989- № 13, P. 114−116.
- Kaji Y., Sugimura K., Kitao M., Ishida T. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI. //J. Comput Assist Tomogr, 1994- № 18, P. 785−792.
- Kamimori T., Sakamoto K., Fujiwara K. et al. Paramesial involvement in FIGO stage IB 1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging //Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2011 Feb- V.21, № 2, P. 349−354.
- Kim J.H., Kim C.K., Park B.W. et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MR imaging in cervical cancer before and after concurrent chemoradiotherapy //Eur. Radiol. 2012 Jun- № 1, P. 26−32.
- Kim J.K., Kim K.A., Park B.W. et al. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience //J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2008- V.28, P. 714−719.
- Kim M.H., Kim J.K., Lee Y. et al. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in uterine cervical cancer: usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis withcomprehensive evaluation of MR images and clinical findings //Acta Radiol. 2011 Dec- V.52, № 10, P. 1175−83.
- Kim M.J., Chung J.J., Lee T.J., Lee Y.H., Yoo H.S. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma. //AJR. 1997- № 168, P. 1215−1223.
- Kim S.H., Choi B.I., Han J.K., Kim H.D. et al. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 Patients. //J. Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993- V. 17, P. 633−640.
- Kim S.K., Choi H.J., Park S.Y., Lee H.Y. et al. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. //Eur. J. Cancer. 2009, V.45, № 12, P. 2103−2109.
- Kim W.Y., Chang S.J., Chang K.H. et al. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging for bladder or rectum invasion in cervical cancer //J. Reprod. Med. 2011 Nov-Dec- V.56, № 11, P. 485−490.
- Koh D.M., Thoeny H.C. Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Application in the body. //Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010- 299 P.
- Lai Ch.H., Huang K.G., See L.Ch., et al. Restaging of Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma with Dual-Phase 18 °F. Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography //Cancer, 2004- V. 100, № 3, P. 544−552.
- Landoni F., Bocciolone L., Perego P., Maneo A. et al. Cancer of the cervix, FIGO stages IB and IIA: patterns of local growth and paracervical extension. //Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 1995- V. 5, № 5, P. 329−334.
- Levy A., Caramella C., Chargari C. et al. Accuracy of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the evaluation of residual cervical carcinoma after radiation therapy //Gynecol. Oncol. 2011 Oct- V.123, № 1, P. l 10−115.
- Li X.C., Shang J.B., Wu X.M., Zeng Q.S. MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging. //Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2007- V. 27, № 3, P. 352−354.
- Lin G., Ho K.C. Wang J.J. et al. Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancer by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T //J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2008- № 28, P. 128−135.
- Liyanage S.H., Roberts C.A., Rockall A.G. MRI and PET scans for primary staging and detection of cervical cancer recurrence //Women's Health, 2010- V. № 6, 2, P. 251−269.
- Mayr N., Yuh W., Jajoura D. Ultra Early Predictive Assay for Treatmrnt Failure Using Functional MRI and clinical Prognostic Parameters in Cervical Cancer. //AJR 2010- № 116, P.903−912.
- McVeigh P.Z., Syed A.M., Milosevic M. et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. //Eur. Radiol. 2009- V.18, P. 1058−1064
- Milestone B.N., Schall M.D., Lenkinski R.E., Kressel H.Y. Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. //Radiology. 1991- V.180, P. 91−5.
- Mitchell D.G., Snyder B., Coakley F., Reinhold C. et al. Early Invasive Cervical Cancer: MRI and CT Predictors of Lymphatic Metastases in the ACRIN 6651 / GOG 183 Intergroup Study. //Gynecol. Oncol. 2009- V. 112, № 1, P. 95−103.
- Mocarska A., Staroslawska E., Kieszko D. et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance in evaluation of cervical cancer progression //Ginekol. Pol. 2012 Feb- V.83, № 2, P. 122−127.
- Monteil J., Maubon A., Leobon S. et al. Lymph node assessment with (18)F-FDG-PET and MRI in uterine cervical cancer //Anticancer Res. 2011 Nov- V.31, № 11, P. 3865−3871.
- Morris M., Eifel P.J., Lu J., Grigsby P.W., Levenback C., Randy E. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and paraaortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. /IN. Engl. J. Med. 1999- № 340, P. l 137−1143.
- Mubarak F., Akhtar M.W., Gul-e-Khanda et al. Staging of endometrial carcinoma by MRI: correlation with surgery and histopathology. //J. Pak. Med. Assoc., 2009 Sep- V. 59, № 9, P. 622−625.
- Naganawa S., Sato S., Kumada H. et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer and uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. //Eur. Radiol. 2005- V.15, P. 71−78.
- Nakai G., Matsuki M., Inada Y. et al. Detection and evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignancies using body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging //J. Cjmput. Assist. Tomogr. 2008- V.32, P. 764−768.
- Nakao Y., Yokoyama M., Hara K. et al. MRI in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the absence of myometrial invasion. //Gynecol. Oncol. 2006 Aug- V. 102, № 2, P. 343−347.
- Ozsarlak O., Tjalma W., Schepens E., Corthouts B. et al. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. //Eur. Radiol. 2003- V. 13, № 10, P. 2338−2345. .
- Park S.O., Kim J. K, Kim K.A. et al. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer //J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2009- V.29, P.383−390.
- Petric A., Stojanov D., Lilic V. et al. The application of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative evaluation of patients with endometrial carcinoma //BUON. 2011 Jul-Sep- V.16, № 3, P. 492−497.
- Piippo U., Paakko E., Makinen M. et al. LocaL staging of rectaL cancer using the bLack Lumen magnetic resonance imaging technique //Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 2008- V. 97, P. 237−242,
- Postema S., Pattynama P., van Rijswijk C., Trimbos B. Cervical Carcinoma: Can Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Help Predict Tumor Aggressiveness? //Radiology 1999- № 210, P.217−220.
- Punwani S. Contrast enhanced MR imaging of female pelvic cancers: established methods and emerging applications //Eur. J. Radiol. 2011 Apr- V.78, № 1, P. 2−11.
- Reinhardt M.J., Ehritt-Braun C., Vogelgesang D. et al. Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Cervical Cancer: Detection with MR Imaging and FDG PET. //Radiology. 2001- № 3, P. 776−782.
- Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. //Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2009- V.105, P. 103−104.
- Reznek R.H. Imaging in cervical cancer: seeing is believing //Brit. J. Radiol. — 2005- Vol. 78, P. 73−85.
- Roberts C., Liyanage S.H., Harry V.N. et al. Functional imaging for assessing tumor response in cancer of the cervix //Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2011 Jul- V.7, № 4, P. 487−497.
- Rockall A.G., Meroni R., Sohaib S.A. Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. /Ant. J. Gynecol, cancer. 2007 Jan-Feb- V. 17, № 1, P. 188−196.
- Rockall A.G., Sohaib S.A., Harisinghani M.G. et al. Diagnostic perfomance of nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. //J. Clin. Oncol. 2005 Apr- V. 23, № 12, P. 2813−2821.
- Rose P.G., Bundy B.N., Watkins E.B., Thigpen J.T., Depppe G., Maiman M.A. Concurrent cisplatin based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. //N. Engl. J. Med. 1999- № 340, P. l 144−1153.
- Sahdev A., Sohaib S.A., Wenaden A.E., Shepherd J.H. et al. The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience. //Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2007- V. 17, № 3, P. 629 636.
- Sala E. MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix //Am. J. Radiol. — 2007- V. 188, P. 1577−1587.
- Sanjuan A., Cobo T., Pahisa J. et al. Preoperative and intraoperative assessment of myometrial invasion and gystologic grade in endometrial cancer: role of MRI and frozen section. //Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2006 Jun -Feb- V.16, № 1, P. 385−390.
- Sanjuan A., Escaramis G., Ayuso J.R. et al. Role of MRI and cause of pitfalls in detecting myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrisl cancer. //Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2008 Dec- V. 278, № 6, P. 535−539.
- Sato S., Itamochi H., Shimada M. et al. Preoperative and intraoperative assessments of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. //Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2009 Jul- V. 19, № 5, P. 884−887.
- Savelli L., Ceccarini M., Ludovisi M. et al. Preoperative Local staging of endometrial cancer: transvaginal sonography vs. MRI. //Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008 May- V. 31, № 5, P. 560−566.
- Seki H., Azumi R, Kimura M. et. al. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of cervix: Assessment with dynamic MR imaging. //AJR 1997- № 168, P.1579−1585.
- Selman T.J., Mann C., Zamora J. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. //Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2008- V. 178, № 7, P. 855−862.
- Selman T.J., Mann C.H., Zamora J. et al. A systematic review of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer. //BMC Womens Health. 2009- № 5, P. 81−88.
- Sethi T.K., Bhalla N.K., Jena A.N., Rawat S. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in carcinoma cervix-does it have a prognostic relevance. //J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2005- № 2, P. 103−107.
- Shen S.H., Chiou Y.Y., Wang J.H. et al. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer//Am. J. Roentgenol., 2008- V.190, P. 481−488.
- Sironi S., Bellomi M., Villa G., Rossi S. Clinical stage I carcinoma of the uterine cervix value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in assessing parametrial invasion. //Tumori. 2002- V. 88, № 4, P. 291−295.
- Sobin L.H. et al. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. NY //Springer-Verlag, 2010- 310 P.
- Somoye G., Harry V., Semple S. et al. Early diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging can predict survival in women with locally advancedcancer of the cervix treated with combined chemo-radiation //Eur. Radiol. 2012 Jun-№l, P. 36−39.
- Suh D.S., Kim J.K., Kim K.R. et al. Reliability of MRI in assessing myometrial invasion absence in endometrial carcinoma. //Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2009- V. 88, № 9, P. 990−993.
- Cancer. 2011 Oct- V.21, № 7, P. 1287−1296.
- Tamai K., Koyama T., Saga T. et al. The utility of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas IIEur. Radiol, 2008- V.18, P. 723−730.
- Togashi K, Nishimura K, Sagoh T, Minami S. et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging. //Radiology. 1989- V.171, P. 245−251.
- Tong T, Yajia G, Huaying W. et al Application of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer //Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Apr- V.285, № 4, P. l 113−1118.
- Undurraga M, Petignat P, Pelte M.F. et al. MRI to identify risk of lymph node metastasis in patiens with endometrial cancer. //Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Mar- V. 104, № 3, P. 233−235.
- Van Hoe L, Vanbeckvoort D, Oyen R. et al. Cervical carcinoma optimized local staging with intravaginal contrast-enhanced MRI preliminary results //Radiology 1999- V.213, P. 608−611.
- Wagenaar H.C. et al. /Tumour diameter and volume assessed by MRI in prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer. //Gynecol. Oncol. -2001- V.82, P.474−482.
- Wang L.J., Wong Y.C., Chen C.J., Huang K.G., Hsueh S. Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with integrated endorectal/phased-array coils: a pilot study. //Eur. Radiol. 2001, V. 11, № 9, p. 1822−1827.
- Xue H.D., Li S., Sun H.Y. et al. Clinical application of body diffusion weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis and preoperative N staging of cervical cancer//Chin. Med. Sci. J. 2008- № 23, P. 133−137.
- Yu K.K., Hricak H., Subak L.L. et al. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spine-echo T2-weighted MRI. //AJR. 1998- V. 171, P. 707−711.
- Zanda K.R., Reinholda C., Abec H. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix //Cancer Imaging 2007- № 7, P. 69−76.
- Zandrino F., Paglia E., Musante F. et al. MRI in local staging of endometrial carcinoma: Diagnostic performance, pitfalls, and literature review. //Tumori. 2010 Jul-Aug- V. 96, № 4, P. 601−608.