ΠŸΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒ Π² написании студСнчСских Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚
АнтистрСссовый сСрвис

ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π²Π½ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΡ€ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… инвСстиций Π² чСловСчСский ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»

ЭссС ΠšΡƒΠΏΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²ΡƒΡŽ Π£Π·Π½Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΡΡ‚ΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΠΌΠΎΠ΅ΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹

Evaluation of investment in human capital may be guided by following theoretical formula (1): Ankroust, O. (1959). Investment and economic growth. Productivity measurement review, No. 16. Ankroust, O. (1959). Investment and economic growth. Productivity measurement review, No. 16. S akalas, A., Liepe, Z. (2010). H uman capital and it’s measurement insight attitudes. Indicators can be measured… Π§ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π΅Ρ‰Ρ‘ >

ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π²Π½ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΡ€ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… инвСстиций Π² чСловСчСский ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π°Π» (Ρ€Π΅Ρ„Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚, курсовая, Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ)

Indicators can be measured by profits, profitability, demand-supply compatibility;

2. Material efficiency of production process (performance indicators: deviation from the plan, defective products, complaints, delivery time and product quality);

3. Intangible efficiency of production process (performance indicators: solving problems and time, preparation for innovations, reduction and elimination of defective products, goal setting, time limited information, etc.);

4. The working morale (job satisfaction, sense of initiative, loss of working time, complaints, ability to assume responsibility, etc.);

5. The morale of inter-relationship between other individuals (assumption of dominance, arrangement for cooperation, friendship, respect, loyalty, teamwork, etc.)

Evaluation of investment in human capital may be guided by following theoretical formula (1):

E = R / I, (1)

where: I — investment in human capital; R — given results from this investment; E — human capital appliance efficiency.

A sserts a clear differentiation of evaluation methods. T here are applied the indicator-based, the value indicators discounting, the value building and other methods. T his increases the possibilities for differentiation of appropriate methods, by selecting the most relevant methods for their particular situation. H owever, there are underused the methods integration opportunities that could greatly expand the utilization possibilities of the methods.

A t macro-economic level, there are insufficiently utilized the indicators-based evaluation methods at the firm level. The proper appliance of these methods would allow expanding the information base opportunities and improving the current level of research into a new one.

Bibliography

Ankroust, O. (1959). Investment and economic growth. Productivity measurement review, No. 16.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE and PERSONNEL TODAY. (2002) Measuring human capital value 2002 survey. London: Deloitte & Touche.

S akalas, A., Liepe, Z. (2010). H uman capital and it’s measurement insight attitudes. E onomics and management.

K aunas University of Technology. K aunas: Technologija. no. 15, 726−732.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE and PERSONNEL TODAY. (2002) Measuring human capital value 2002 survey. London: Deloitte & Touche.

Ankroust, O. (1959). Investment and economic growth. Productivity measurement review, No. 16.

S akalas, A., Liepe, Z. (2010). H uman capital and it’s measurement insight attitudes.

E onomics and management. K aunas University of Technology.

K aunas: Technologija. no. 15, 726−732.

ΠŸΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ вСсь тСкст

Бписок Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρ‹

  1. Bibliography
  2. , O. (1959). Investment and economic growth. Productivity measurement review, No. 16.
  3. DELOITTE & TOUCHE and PERSONNEL TODAY. (2002) Measuring human capital value 2002 survey. London: Deloitte & Touche.
  4. Sakalas, A., Liepe, Z. (2010). Human capital and it’s measurement insight attitudes. Eonomics and management. Kaunas University of Technology. Kaunas: Technologija. no. 15, 726−732.
Π—Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡƒ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΉ
ΠšΡƒΠΏΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²ΡƒΡŽ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρƒ

Π˜Π›Π˜