ΠΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΊΡΡ, ΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΌΠ°ΠΌ
ΠΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ
ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΡΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°. ΠΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ±, ΠΏΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² (ΠΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅, 1992; Π‘Π°1-ΠΏΠ΅ΠΊ, 1992), ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΡ, Π² ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ±, Π½Π°Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·ΠΎ-ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΠ½Π° Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π° Π² 50-Π΅ ΠΈ 70-Π΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Ρ . Π§Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠ°… Π§ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ Π΅ΡΡ >
Π‘ΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΠΊ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ
- ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Π.Π. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ² ΠΎΡ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·Π°// ΠΠ΅ΠΆΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊ, Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Ρ Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ. Π., 1973. Π‘. 153−154.
- ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Π.Π. Π‘Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΡΡ, ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΎΡ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·Π° // ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ. ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄. Π΄ΠΈΡΡ. Π. 1989. Π‘.1−16.
- ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ² Π.Π€., Π¨ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ Π. Π. ΠΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ // Π., ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠ‘ΠΠ₯, 1993.
- ΠΠΈΠΎΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ // ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ·Π°Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊ, ΠΠ°Ρ. Π€ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΠ Π‘Π‘Π‘Π , ΠΈΠ½-Ρ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, 1982.
- ΠΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ±ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π‘.Π. Π‘Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡ // Π., ΠΠ³ΡΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ·Π΄Π°Ρ, 1991.
- ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π.Π. Π€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π±ΠΈΠΎΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ. ΠΠΈΠΎΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ // 1982. Π‘.5−23.
- Π’ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π²Π° Π., ΠΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π. ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΡ // ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡ, 1996. Π‘.34−35.
- ΠΡΠΎΡ ΠΈΠ½ Π.Π., Π‘ΠΎΠ»Π΄Π°ΡΠΎΠ² Π. Π., Π€ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΠΎΠ² Π. Π. ΠΠ½Π±ΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π³ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ //Π., ΠΠ³ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ·Π΄Π°Ρ, 1985.
- ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π.Π. ΠΡΠΎΠ³ΠΈ 5 Π»Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΡΡ, ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·Π° // ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅Ρ, Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·. ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ. ΠΏΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌ Ρ.-Ρ . ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ // ΠΡΠΊΠΎΠ², 1968. Π‘. 316−321.
- ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π.Π. Π‘ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΊΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π±Π΅Π»Π°Ρ, ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·Π° Π¨Π£ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡ. Π°ΡΡΠΎΡ. ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² // ΠΠ΅Π»Π³ΡΠ°Π΄, 1969. Π‘.377−383.
- ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π.Π., ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°ΡΠ.Π. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ ΡΠΌΠ±ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΊΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π±Π΅Π»Π°Ρ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ 9787 Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ· ΠΏΡΠΈΡ // Π‘Π±. Π½Π°ΡΡ. ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΠΠΠΠ, 1971. ΠΡΠΏ. 8 (29). Π‘.7−21.
- ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π.Π., ΠΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Π² Π€. Π‘. Π‘Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ// ΠΠΈΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅Ρ, ΠΌΠ΅Π΄., 1978. Π’Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π΄Ρ 15. Π‘.568−571.
- ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π.Π., ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π° Π. Π. Π‘Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Ρ Ρ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ // Π’Π΅Π·. Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ». ΠΠΠ, 1982. Π‘.91−92.
- ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π.Π. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. Π‘ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΡΡ ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΌΠ°ΠΌ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡ // Π., 1989. Π‘. 1−47.
- ΠΠ°Π»ΡΠΉΠ½Π° Π., Π‘Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π. Π¦ΠΈΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΊΡΡ // ΠΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ, ΠΠΎΠΊΡΠ»Π°Ρ, 1985.
- ΠΠ°ΡΠΏΡΡΡ Π., ΠΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ½Π° Π. Π€ΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° ΡΡΠΏΠ»ΡΡ-Π±ΡΠΎΠΉΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² // ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡ, 1996. № 9. Π‘.465−467.
- ΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½ P.A., ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π. Π. ΠΠΏΡΡ ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ.-Π., ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ, 1984. 222 Ρ.
- ΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½ P.A., ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π. Π., ΠΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Π. Π. ΠΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ, — Π., 1989.
- ΠΡΠΊΠ°ΠΉΠ½ P.A., ΠΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π. Π€., ΠΠ»ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π’. Π. ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡΡ,-Π ΠΈΠ³Π°, 1981. 273 Ρ.
- ΠΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ ΠΈ Π·Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ , ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ΅Π΄. Π. Π. Π¨ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π. Π. ΠΡΡΠ±Ρ, Π., 1997.
- ΠΠΎΡ Π., ΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½ Π ., ΠΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΅Π² Π. ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ° // Π‘Π±. Π½Π°ΡΡ. ΡΡ. ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠ. № 49. Π‘. 114−120.
- ΠΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ, ΠΠ·Π΄. Positive Action Publication Lim-ited№ 4, 1997.
- ΠΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ² Π.Π., ΠΠΈΠ³Π°ΡΠ΅Π² Π. Π., ΠΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠΎΠ²Π° Π. Π. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°. Π., ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ, 1996, Π‘. 246, 321−322.
- Π‘ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π° Π.Π. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ // Π‘Π±. Π½Π°ΡΡ. ΡΡ. ΠΠΠΠΠΠ Π, 1976. № 22. Π‘. 116−123.
- Π‘ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π° Π.Π., Π€Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π° Π‘. Π., Π¨ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Π. Π. ΠΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΡΡ, ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΌ // Π’Π΅Π·. Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ». III ΡΡΠ΅Π·Π΄ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠ‘ ΠΈΠΌ. ΠΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°, 1977. Π‘. 211−212.
- Π‘ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π° Π.Π. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ // Π‘Π±. Π½Π°ΡΡ. ΡΡ. ΠΠΠΠΠ Π, 1979. № 28. Π‘. 16−22.
- Π‘ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π° Π.Π. Π‘Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ± ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅Π³Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΌΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡ. ΠΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅Π³Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ, 1989. Π‘. 23−24.
- Π‘ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Π.Π., ΠΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Π. Π’. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π₯ΠΠ-ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΌ // ΠΠ°ΡΡ.-ΡΠ΅Ρ Π½. Π±ΡΠ»Π»., Π₯Π°ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ², 1979. № 6. Π‘. .
- ΠΠ»ΠΎΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π.Π. ΠΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ, Π., ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ, 1970.
- Adene D. A review of studies on Marek’s disease and other aviane neoplasms in Africa // Proceedings XIX Worlds Poultry Congress, 1992, — P.293−297.
- Alsem S., Garlich J., Qureshi M., Nicolas-Bolnet C. Dietary phosphorus and immune functions in broilers // Poultry Sci. 73, 1994, — P. 1−76.
- Avakian A. et al., Efficacy of novelu infections bursal disease vaccine administered in ovo broiler chickens // Ponetry Sci. 72, 1993, — P. 1−49.
- BachevN., LalevM. Resistance to Marek’s disease of fowl s of different cholinecsterase genotypes to relation to phagochite activity // Zhivonotnov. Nanki, 1990. № 27.P.52−56.
- Bacon I d., Smith E., Faey A., Crittenden L. Development of a alloantiserum (R2) that detects subseptibility of chickens virus // Avian. Pathol., 1966. V.25. № 3.P.551−568.
- Bacon L.D., Witter R.L., Fadly A. Augmentation of retrivirus- induced lym-phoid leukosis by Marek’s diease herpesviruses in White Leghorn chickens // J. Virol., 1989. № 63, — P.504−512.
- Becker Y., Asher Y. et al. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of MDV-1 DNA // Preceding XIX Wourled’s Pouentry Congress, 19 .- P.216−219.
- Bianes D., Gildershivs R. Today’s techology for tomorrow’s chalenges // Jnt. Hatchery Pract., 1995. V.9. № 3. C III-VI.- P.51−69.
- Biozzi G., Menton O.A. et al. Genetics of immunoresponsinous to natural antigens in the mouse // Current Topies in Microbiol. Immunol., 1979. V. 85.-P.31−99.
- Bulow V. Episootology of Marek’s disease // Proceeding XIX World’s Pou-try Congress, 1992. -P.286−292.
- Calnek B.W. Marek’s disease virus and lymphoma // In. F. Rapp.(ed) Onco-gonic Herpesviruses CRC Pross., 1980. P. 103−143.
- Calnek B.W. Genetic resistance in Marek’s disease //Ed. L. Payne., 1985. -P.293−328.
- Calnek B.W. Marek’s desease a model for herpesvirus oncology // CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 1986. V.12.- P. 293−326.
- Calnek B.W. Chicken neoplasia a model for cancer research // Br. Puilt. Sci., 1992. V.33. -P.3−16.
- CalnekB.W., WitterR.L. Marek’s disease //B.W. Calnek (eds) Diseases of Poultry, 1991. -P.342−385.
- Calnek B.W. Marek’s disease: contributions to comparative herpes virology and oncology // Procedings XIX World’s Poultry Congress, 1992. -P.220−232.
- Chang S., Lamont S. Genetic analysis if immunocompetence measures in White Leghorn line // Ponetry Sci., 1988. V.67. -P.989−995.
- Chausse A., Thoraval P., Dambrine G., AuffrayC., CoudertF. Molecular marcer associated witle resistance to the tumours of Marek’s disease // Annales de Re-cherckes Veterinares, 1990. V.21. -P.298.
- Chen C., Gobel T., Kubota., Cooper M. T-cell development in the chicken // Poultry Sci., 1994. V.73. № 7. P.1012−1018.
- Churchill A., Biggs P. Agent of Marek’s desease in tissue culture // Nature, 1967. V.215. -P.528−530.
- Desrosiers R., Silva D., Waredron L., Letvin N. Mononcogenic deletion mutants of herpesvirus saimiri are defective for in vitro immortalization //J. Vivol., 191. V.57. -P.701−705.
- Dickerson G. Evidence concerming genetic improvement in commercial stocksof layers //Pouetry Sci., 1976. V.55. № 6. -P.2327−2342.
- Dictert R., Golemboski K., Austic R. Environment immune interaction // Poultry Sci., 1994. V.73. № 7. -P.1062−1076.
- Dietert R.D., Taylor R., Dietert M. Biological function on the chicken major hostocompatibility complex// Crit. Rev. Poultry. Biol., 1991. V.3. -P.l 11−129.
- Fabricant C., a Fabricant G. Pathogenesis of MDV induced atherosclerosis // Proc. 3 Int. Symp. of Marek’s disease, Japan, 1988. -P.317−323.
- Fadly A.M., Witter K.L. Resistance of line 6 chickens to reticuloendothelio-sis virus induced bursa-associated lymphomas // Intl. Cancer., 1986. V.38. -P.139−143.
- Falk L.A. Simian herpesviruses and their oncogenic properties. Chapter 5 // Oncogenic Herpesviruses CRC. Press., 1980. V.l. -P.145−173.
- Fischers M. et al., Marek’s disease virus isolates with muscular tropism and virulence for ocular tissues: clinical finding, challenge studies and pathological fetures //Avian. Pathol., 1991. V.20. -P.461−474.
- Flock D., Landgraf H., Vielise E. Untersuchungen uber die Marek-resistense verschiedener Legehybridherkunfte! l Arch. Geflugelk, 1976. V.40. № 3. -P.109−114.
- Gavora J., Gowe R., McAllister A. Vaccination againstMarek’s disease: efficacy of cell-associated and lymphilized herpesvirus of turliey^n nine strains leghorns // Poultry Sci., 1977. V.56. -P.846−853.
- Gavora J., Spencer J., OkagaL, Grunnder A. Correlations of genetic resistance of chickens to Marec’s disease viruses with vaccinatiorfprotection arid in vitro response to phytohemaglutium// Genet. Sci. Evol., 1990. V.22. -P.457 469.
- Gavora J. Disease genetics // Poultry Breeding and Genetics, 1990. -P.805 846.
- Gavora J. Genetic aspects in interactious between Marek’s disease viruses and their hosts //Proceeding XIX Wourld’s Poultry Congress, 1992. -P. 175−180.
- Gellatin W., Longeneeker B. Expression genetic resistance to an oncogenia herpes virus of the target cell level //Nature, 1979. V.280. -P.587−589.
- Guillemott F., Auffray c. Molecular biology of the chicken major histocompatibility commplex // Crit. Rev. Poult. Biol., 1989. V.2. -P.255−275.
- Guillemot F., Kaufman J., Skjoedt K., Auffray C. The major histocompatibility complex in the chicken // Trends in Genet., 1989. V.5. -P. 300−304.
- HaddadE. et al., Efficacy of novel infectious bursal disease vaccine administered in ovo to SPE chickeus // Poultry Sci. 72 Suppl., 1993. V.l. -P.49.
- Heller E., Uni Z., Carsolli L. Association between MHC marcers and immunology traits in meat-type chickens // Proceedings XIX World’s Poultry Congress, 1992. -P.773−778.
- Hutt F.B. The utilizaton of genetic resistance to disease in domestic animals // Genetic. Today, 1965. V.3. P.775−782.
- Hutt F.B. Advances in breeding for resistance to disease in domestic animals //Acta Veterinara (Brno), 1972. V.41. № 3. -P.309−319.
- Ho J. Carrent knowledge of the epidemology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Onkogenesis a. Herpesviruses, Lyon, 1972. -P.357−366.
- IkutaK. et al., Establishment and charocterization of a T-lymphoblastiod cell line MDCC-MTBI derived from chicken lymphocytes in vitro with Marek’s disease virus serotype // Int. J. Cancer, 1987. V.39. -P.514−520.
- Iotova I. Themorequlation mechanisms in relationship to genetic resistance of broiler and egg-producing lines of fowls to Marek’s disease virus // Zhivotnov’s dni Nauki, 1988. V.25. -P.78−94.
- Iotova I. et al. The relationship of the resistance of the different alcaline phosphatase genotypes of brioler-type fowls with carcass quality and resistance to Marek’s disease // Zhovotnov’s dni Nauki, 1990. V.27. -P.60−65.
- Ishizari K., Vogt P. Immunological relationships among envelope antigens of avian tumor viruses // Virology, 1966. V. 30. -P.375−387.
- Jani P., Prajapati K. Pathological aspects of acute Marek’s disease // Proc. XIX World’s Poultry Congress, 1992. -P.195−198.
- JanagidaN., LeeL., Joshidal. Nazerain Nucleotide seqence and predicted amino acid sequence on Marek’s disease virus homologs of UL 49, UL 48, UL 47, UL 46 of herpes simplex virus // Procced. XIX Wourld’s Ponetry Congress, 1992. -P.44−48.
- JasaN., Imai K. Efficocy of Marek’s disease herpesvirus of turkeys in chickens infected with chickeu anemia agent // 1988. -P. .
- Joshida I. Present status of the practical research on Marek’s disease in Japan // Int. Symp. of Infectious Disease of Livestock, Tsukuda, 1980. V.13. -P.79−95.
- Kornegay J., GorgaczE. Marek’s disease virus induced transient paralysis in checkens electron microscopic lesions // Acta Neuropathol, 1988. V.75. -P.597−604.
- LeeL., WitterR. Humoral immune responses to inactivated oil-emulsified Marek-s disease vaccine // Avian. Dis., 1991. V.35. -P.452−459.
- Leitner G., Uni Z., CahanerA., Heller E. Replicated detergent selection ofmeat-type chickens for hogh on low early immune response to E. coli vaccination // Ponetry Sei., 1992. V.71. -P.27−37.
- Lin J., KOdamaH., OnutaM., Mikami T. The early pathogenesis in chiken inoculated with non-pathogenic serotype 2 Marek’s disease virus // J. Vet. Med. Sei., 1991. V.53. -P.269−273.
- MaotaniK., Kanamori A., IkutaK. et al. {mmplification of a tandem direct repeat within inverted repeats of Marek’s disease virus DNA during serial in vitro passage // J. Virol., 1986. V.58. -P.657−660.
- Matta M., Coudert F., Canehy L., Bernard S. Humoral and cellular of the resistant and sensitive chickens against Marek’s disease // Vet. e. zootech., 1995 a. V.7. -P.63−74.
- Maurice D., Lightsay S., HsuR., Gavlord T. Immunoenhancement in chickens fed excess vitamin c is dependent on genotype and concentration // Poultry Sei., 1993. V.72, Suppl. -P. 1−55.
- McGranderE., KogutM. et al. Comparison of prophylactic and therapentic efficacy of Salmonella enterifids immune lymphokine in neonatal leghorn chicks // Abstr. Pat. 15th Annu. Mut. South. Poultry. Sei. Soc. In Poultry Sei., 1994. V.73, Suppl. -P.1−150.
- Nahmais A., NorrildB. Oncogennic potential of herpes simplex viruses and. tluir association with cervical neoplasia. Chapter 3 // Oncogenic Nerpesvirusess V. I., 1980. -P.25−45.
- Nazerian K., Lee L., JanagidaN., Ogaeva R. Protections aginst Marek’s disease by fowlpox virus recombinant expressing the glycopuotrein B of Marek’s disease virus // J. Virol., 1992. V. 66. -P. 1409−1413.
- Niikura M., MatsunraJ., Hattori M. et al. Expression of the A antigen (gp 57−65) of Marek’s disease virus by a recombinant baculovirus //J. Gen. Virol., 1991. V. 72. -P.1099−1104.
- O’Hare P., Hayward J. Three trans-acting requlatory proteins of herpes, simplex virus modulate immediate early gene expression in a pathway involving positive and negative requlation // J. Virol., 1985. V.56. № 4. -P.723−733.
- PadalkarR., KulkarniM., GugarH. Effects of cyclophosphatide on populations of T and B lymphocytes in chickens against Marek’s disease // J. Maharashafra Agr. Univ., 1993. V.18. № 2. -P.272−275.
- ParmetierH., SicmonsmaR., NieuwlandH. Immune response to bovine serum albumine in chicken lines divergently selected for antibody sespouses to sheep red blood cells // Poultry Sci., 1994. V.73. № 6. -P.825−835.
- Payne L.N., Frazier J., Powell P. Pathogenesis of Marek’s disease // Int. Rev. Exp. Pathol., 1976. V.16. -P. 59−154.
- Payne L.N. Marek’s disease scietific basis and methods of control //U.S., 1985. -P. 1−230.
- Payne L. Pathogenesis of Marek’s disease recent developments // Procudings XIX World’s Poultry Congress, 1992. -P.189−194.
- Petcovsky J., Heller E., Cahaher A., Poley B. Selection for early responseve-neus of chicks to E. coli and Newcasle virus // Poultry Sci., 1987. V.66. -P. 1276−1282.
- Pevsner I., Stone H., Nordskog A. Immune response and disease resistance in chicks. 1. Selection for high and low titer to Salmonella pullutrum antigen // Poultry Sci., 1981. V.60. -P.920−926.
- Powell P., Davidson, The interaction between stress and Marek’s disease //
- Proc. 8-th Inter. Congress of the World Vet. Poultry Assoc., 1985. -P.109.
- Pulaski J., TieberV., ConssensP. Marek’s disease virus-mediated enhancement of avian leukosis virus gene expression and virus production // Virology, 1992. V.186. -P. 113−121.
- QureschM., Gareicn J., KiudM. Dietary Spirulina plantensis enhances humoral and cell-mediate immune functions in chickens // Immunopharmocol. & Immu-notoxicol., 1966. V.18. № 3. -P.465−465.
- Roizman B. et al. The family Herpesviridae: an update // Arch. Viril, 1992. V.123.№ 2. -P.425−449.
- Rose N. Avian models of autoimmune disease: lessons from the birds // Poultry Sci., 1994. V.73. № 7. -P.984−990.
- Ross L. Molecular biology of the virus. Chapter 5 // Marek’s disease Scientific Basis and Methods of control, 1985. -P.113−150.
- Rouse B., Norley S., Martin S. Antiviral cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction and vaccination//Rev. Infiot. Dis., 1988. V.10. -P. 16−33.
- Salahuddin S., Ablashi et al. Isolation of a new virus HBLV in patienta with lymphoproliferative disorders // Science, 1986. V.234. -P.596−601.
- Schat K.A. Marek’s disease: a model for protection against herpesvirus induced tumors // Cancer Surveys, 1987a. V.6. -P. 1−37.
- Schat K.A. Immunity in Marek’s disease and other tumors // Avian Immunology Basis and Practice, 1987b. V.ll.P.101−128.
- Schat K.A. Importance of cell-mediated immunity in Marek’s disease and other viral tumor disease // Poultry Sci., 1991. V.70. -P.l 165−1175.
- Schat K.A., Chen-Lo C. et al., Trasformation of T-lymphocute subsets by Marek’s disease herpesvirus//J.Virol., 1991. V.65. -P.1408−1413.
- Schat K. A., Pratt W.D., MorgcenR., CalnekB. Stable transpection of re-, ticuloendo the Piosis virus-trasformed lymphoblastoid lines // Avian Dis., 1992. V.36. -P. 1115−1126.
- SchatK.A. Immune responses against Marek’s disease virus 11 Procuding XIX World’s Poultry Congress, 1992. -P.233−238.
- SchatK. Cell-mediated immune effector functions in chickens // Poultry Sci., 1994. V.73. № 7. -P.1077−1081.
- Sharma J.M. Immunology of Marek’s disease // Advances in Marek’s disease research, Japan. 1988. -P.204−220.
- Sharma J.M., Schat K.A. Natural immune functions // Avia Collular Immunology, 1991.-P.51−70.
- Sharma J.M., Prowse S.J., York J.J. Role of cellular immunity in neoplstic and noneoplastic viral disease // Avian Cellular Immunology, 1991. -P. 139−154.
- Sharma J., KaracaK., Pertile T. Virus-induced immunosuppression in chickens // Poultry Sci., V.73. № 7. -P. 1082−1086.
- SeiqelP., Cross W. Production and presis tence of cutibodies in chicens to sheep erythocytes. Direction selection // Poultry Sci., 1980. V.59. -P. 1−5.
- SklanD., MelamedD., Friedman A. The effect of varing levels of dietary vitamin A on immune respose in the chickens // Poultry Sci., 1994. V.73. № 6. -P.843−847.
- Smith M.W., Calnek B.W. High-virulence Marek’s disease virus infection in chickens previosby infected with low-virulence virus //J. Natl. Cancer. Inst., 1974. V.52. -P.1592−1603.
- Solomon P., BurmesterB., Prodrichson T. Investigation of lymphoid leuko-sisinfection in genetically similar chicken population // Avian Disease, 1966. V.10. № 4. -P. 477−484.
- SwayneD., Fletcher O., SchiermanL. Marek’s disease virus induced transient paralysis alteration in brain density // Acta Neuropathol., 1988. V.76. -P.287−291.
- SwayneD., FletcherO., SchiermauL. Marek’s disease virus-induced transient patalysis in chickens. 1. Time course association between clinical sighs and histological brain lesins // Avian Puthol, 1989 a. V.18. -P.385−396.
- Swayne D. et al. Marek’s disease virus induced transient paralysis in chickens. // Differentiation of field cases from classical Marek’s disease by central nervous system lesions // Avian Pathol., 1989 b. V.18. -P.413−431.
- TajimaM., Kato K. et al. Chicken anemia agent infection as a possible cause of Marek’s disease vaccination failure // Japanese Association of Marek’s Disease, Osaka, 1988. -P.364−366.
- Uni Z., Heller J., WemanR. et al. RELP of MHC class IV genotypes in meat-type chickens // Animal Genet., 1992. V.23. -P.319−324.
- Vital C., Vital A. et al. Peripheral neuropathies and lymphoma without monoclonal gammopathy: a new classification//J.Neurol., 19. V.237. -P.177−185.
- VogtP. Phenotypic micing in the avian tumor group // Virology, 1967. V.32. № 4. -P.708−717.
- Witter R. Principles of vaccination. Chapter 8 // Marek’s disease seintific Basis and Methods of Control, 1985. -P.203−250.
- Witter R. New serotype 2 and attenuated serotype 1 Marek’s disease vaccine viruses: comparative efficacy // Avian Dis., 1987. V.31. -P.752−765.
- Witter R. Protection by attented and polyvalent vacines against highely virulent strains of Marek’s disease virus // Avain. Pathol., 1992 a. V.ll. -P.49−62.
- Witter R. Resent development in the prevention and control of Marek’s disease, 1992 b.-P.298−304.
- Witter R. Safety and Comparative efficacy of the CV 1988 rispens vaccine strain // Procuding XIX Womid’s Poultry Congress, 1992 c. -P.315−319.