Поэтика театральности в драматургии Шекспира: На примере трагедии «Гамлет»
Диссертация
В результате проведенного исследования выявлены инвариантные модели построения шекспировской пьесывыделена наикратчайшая значимая, дискретная единица драматического текстарассмотрена взаимосвязь словесных приемов выразительности с другими структурными элементами текста. В диссертации приводятся результаты анализа ряда структурных элементов текста: обратно симметричной конструкции, приема повтора… Читать ещё >
Список литературы
- Брук, Питер. Пустое пространство. Секретов нет. -М., 2003. -376 с.
- Евреинов Н, Н. Демон театральности. -М., 2002. -535 с.
- МукаржовскийЯ. К современному состоянию теории театра//Исследования по эстетике и теории искусства. -М., 1994.-235 с,
- Пахсаряьян Н.Т. Поэтика театральности в «Театре Клары Газуль» П.Мериме. -М., 2004.
- Полякова Е.А. Поэтика драмы и эстетика театра в романе. -М,. -325 с.
- Balme, Christopher. Theatricality, Perception and Performance, bistitut for Theaterwissebschaft. -Universitat Mainz. 2000. -124 p.
- Barish, Jonas. The Antitheatrical Prejudice. -Berkeley: Univ. of CaUfomia Press. 1981.
- Bartes, Roland. Baudelaire’s Theater, in: A Roland Barthes Reader, ed. with an intro. By Susan Sontag, London: Vintage, 1982.-270 p.
- Bums, Elisabeth. Theatricality. London. -Longman. 1972.- 380 p.
- Fried, Michael. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and the Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Berkeley 1980.
- Meisel, Martin. Realizations: Narrative, Pictorial, and Theatrical Arts, bi Nineteenth Century England. Princeton 1983. -138 p.
- Marshall, David. The Figure of Theater: Shaftesbury, Defoe, Adam Smith, and George Eliot. -New York: Columbia University Press 1986. p. 116−128.
- Murray, Timothy (ed.) Mimesis, Masochism, and Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought. — Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press 1997. p.27−44. 1^ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ПО МЕТАТЕАТРУ
- Abel, Lionel. Metatheatre: А New View of Dramatic Form. -New York: Hill and Wang, 1963.-146 p.
- Benjamin, Walter. What is Epic Theater? 1939. -bi Benjamin, Illuminations. — New York: Schocken Books, 1969. -p. 147−54-
- Boireau, Nicole. Drama on Drama: Dimensions of Theatricality on the Contemporary British Stage. -Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997.168 p.
- Brecht, Bertolt. Brecht on Theatre. Ed. and trans. John Willett. -New York: Hill, 1964.-170 p.
- Calderwood, James L. Shakespeare’s Metadrama. -Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1971.-146 p.
- Calderwood, James L. Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Henriad: ШснАЬШ II to HENRYV.L., 1979.230p.
- Calderwood, James L. Richard II: Metadrama and the Fall of Speech. From Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Henriad. In Shakespeare’s History Plays (Richard II to Henry V). (New Casebooks). — Houndmills: Macmillan, 1992. -p. 121−35.
- Calderwood, James 1: To Be and Not to Be: Negation and Metadrama in HAMLET. -New York: Columbia UP, 1983.
- Hubert, Judd D. Metatheater: The Example of Shakespeare. -Lincoln: U of NebraskaP, 1991.-170p.
- Moore, Timothy J. The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. -Austin: U of Texas P, 1999. (Reflexivity).
- Nelson, R. J. Play Within the Play: The Dramatist’s Conception of His Art, Shakespeare to Anouilh. -New Haven: Yale UP, 1958. -235 p.
- Righter, Anne. Mysteries and Moralities: The Audience as Actor. -In Righter, Shakespeare and the Idea of the Play. 1962. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967.p.l5−40.
- Righter, Anne. The World and the Stage. In Righter, Shakespeare and the Idea of the Play. 1962. -Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967. -p.59−78. The Play Metaphor. Inheritance and Experiment. The New Attitude towards the Audience.
- Righter, Anne. Shakespeare and the Idea of the Play. -London: Chatto and Windus, 1962.-164p.
- Ringer, Mark. Electra and the Empty Um: Metatheater and Role Playing in Sophocles. -U of North Carolina Press, 1998- Schlueter, June. Metafictional Characters in Modem Drama. -New York: Columbia UP, 1977.
- Sith, Dane F. Plays about the Theatre in England. -L., 1936. -264 p.
- Styan, J. L. Shakespeare’s Stagecraft. -Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1975.280 p.
- Tonelli, Franco. Sophocles' Oedipus and the Tale of the Theater. -Ravenna: 1. ongo Editore, 1983.
- Voigt, J. Das Spiel im Spiel: Versuch einer Formbestimmung an Beispielen aus dem deutschen, englischen und spanischen Drama. Diss. -Gottingen, 1955.
- Watts, Cedric. Hamlet. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1988. РАБОТЫ ПО ТЕАТРУ ЭПОХИ ШЕКСПИРА
- Аникст А.А. Синтез искусств в театре Шекспира. Шекспировские чтения 1985.-м., 1987.-с. 15−40.
- Бартошевич А.В. Шекспир. Англия. XX век. -М., 1994. -413 с.
- Бояджиев Г. Н. Вечно прекрасный театр эпохи Возрождения: Италия, Испания, Англия. -Л, 1973. -471 с.
- Варшер А. Английский театр эпохи Шекспира. -П., 1920. -74 с.
- Мюллер В.К. Драма и театр эпохи Шекспира. -Л., 1925. -168 с.
- Пинский Л.Е. Реализм эпохи Возрождения. -М., 1961. -323 с.
- Bates, Jonathan, and Russell Jackson, eds. Shakespeare: An Illustrated Stage History. -New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. — 480 p.
- Bradbrook, М.С. Elizabethan Stage Conditions: A Study of Their Place in the Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Plays. -Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1962.
- Bradbrook, M.C. The Living Monument: Shakespeare and the Theatre of His Time. Cambridge- -New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976- rptd. 1979.
- Chambers, E.K. The Elizabethan Stage. 4 Volumes. -Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1923.460 р.
- Craik, W.T. The Tudor Interlude: Stage, Costume, and Acting. Leicester: University Press, 1958.
- Dessen, Alan. Elizabethan Drama and the Viewer’s Eye. Chapel Hill: University ofNorth Carolina Press, 1977- rpt. 1979.
- Dessen, Alan. Elizabethan Stage Conventions and Modem Interpreters. Cambridge- -New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984. -124 p.
- Galloway, David, ed. The Elizabethan Theatre III: Papers Presented at the Third Intemational Conference on Elizabethan Theatre, 1970, University of Waterloo. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1973.
- Griffin, Alice S.V. Pageantry on the Shakespearean Stage. -New York: Twayne, 1951.-116 p.
- Gurr, Andrew. The Shakespearean Stage, 1574−1642. — Cambridge: University Press, 1970.-435 p.
- Hillebrand, Harold Newcomb. The Child Actors: A Chapter in Elizabethan Stage History. — New York: Russell and Russell, 1926- rptd. 1964.
- Lawrence, William John. The Elizabethan Playhouse and Other Studies. 2 Volumes. -New York: Russell and Russell, 1912−1913- фtd. 1963.
- Lawrence, William John. Pre-Restoration Stage Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1927. — 127 p.
- McGee, Arthur. The Elizabethan Hamlet. -New Haven: Yale, 1987. — 217 p.
- Mills, John A. Hamlet on Stage: The Great Tradition. -Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985. -385 p.
- Muir, Kenneth. The Sources of Shakespeare’s Plays. -New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978. (Chapt. 24, -pp. 158−169) ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ О «ГАМЛЕТЕ»
- Adelman, Janet. Man and Wife Is One Flesh: Hamlet and the Confrontation with the Maternal Body. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. By Adelman. -New York: Routledge, 1992.-p.l 1−37.
- Alexander, Nigel. Critical Disagreement About Oedipus and Hamlet. — «^ Shakespeare Survey 20.1967. -p.33−39.
- Alexander, Nigel. Poison, Play and Duel. A Study in Hamlet. -L., 1971.-138 p.
- Alexander, Peter. Hamlet, Father and Son. -Oxford. 1955. -218 p.
- Altick, Richard. Hamlet and the Odor of Mortality. -Shakespeare Quaterly 5. 1954.-P.167−76.
- Anderson, Mary. «Hamlet: The Dialect Between Eye and Ear.- Renaissance and Reformation 27 (1991). «p.299−313. ^ 68. Andreas, James R. The Vulgar and the Polite: Dialogue in Hamlet. -Hamlet Studies 15 (1993).-p. 9−23.
- Amett, David B. What Makes Hamlet Run? Framing Cognition Discursively. — Hamlet Studies 16 (1994). -p. 24−41.
- Babcock, Weston. Hamlet: A Tragedy of Errors. -Lafayette, Ind. 1961. — 216 p.
- Bell, Millicent. Hamlet, Revenge! -Hudson Review 51 (1998). -p.310−28.
- Bevington, David. Twentieth Century Interpretations of «Hamlet». A Collection of Critical Essays. — Englewood. CUffs. 1968. -487 p.
- Bloom, Harold, ed. Hamlet. Major Literary Characters. -New York: Chelsea House, 1990.-143 p
- Bloom, Harold. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Modem critical interpretations. -N.Y. Chelsea House. 1986. -p.61. (on structure)
- Bloom, Harold. Shakespeare. The Invention of the Human. -N.Y. 1998. — 630 p.
- Bloom, Harold. Hamlet. Poem Unlimited. N.Y.2003. — 176 p.
- Boklund, Guraiar. Judgement in Hamlet. In: Gerald W. Chapman Essays on Shakespeare. — Princeton. 1965. -p.l 16−37.
- Boas, Frederick S. The Play within the Play A Series of Papers on Shakespeare and the Theatre. by the Members of the Shakespeare Association. -London: for the Shakespeare Association by Oxford University Press, 1927. — 371 p.
- Bolt, Sydney. Penguin Critical Studies in EngUsh Literature. Hamlet. -L., 1990. -p. 13−15. (on revenger, who does not seek «justice» as inpersonal motive)
- Goddard, Harold. The meaning of Shakespeare. Vol. 1. -Univ. Of Chicago Press. 1960. -p. 340−41. (on Brutus as Hamlet in rebenge role).
- Bonjour, Adrien. On Artistic Unity in Hamlet. -English Studies 21. 1939. — p. 193−202.
- Booth, Stephen. On the Value of Hamlet. In: Norman Rabkin: Reinterpretations of Elizabethan Drama: Selected papers from the English Institute. -N.Y. 1969. -p. 137−76.
- Bowers, Fredsom Thayer. Hamlet as Minister and Scourge. -PMLA 70. 1955. — p.740−49.
- Bowers, Fredsom Thayer. The Death of Hamlet. A Sudy in Plot and Character, bi: Josephine W. Benett, Oscar CargiU and Vemon Hall: Studies in the English Reaissance Drama. -N.Y. 1959.-p.28−42.
- Bowers, Fredsom Thayer. Dramatic Criticism and Structure: Plot in Hamlet. — Shakespeare Quaterly 15.1964. -p.207−18.
- Braddy, Haldeen. Hamlet’s Wounded Name. — El Paso. 1964. p.98.
- Bradley, A.C. Shakespearean Tragedy: Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. New York: Meridian Books, 1955. -p.391.
- Brennan, Anthony. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Structures. -Routledge 1986. (on structure), p.217.
- Brooks, Jean R. Hamlet and Ophelia as Lovers: Some Interpretations on Page and Stage. -Aligorh Critical Miscellany 4.1 (1991). -p. 1−25.
- Brown, John Russell. Connotations of Hamlet’s Final Silence. — Connotations 2 (1992).-p. 275−86.
- Brown, Arthur. The Play within a Play: An Ehzabethan Dramatic Device. — English Association Essays and Studies 13 (1960). -p. 36−48.
- Brown, John Russell. Multiplicity of Meaning in the Last Moments of Hamlet. — Connotations 2 (1992). -p. 16−33.
- Bugliani, Francesca. 'bi the mind to suffer': Hamlet’s Soliloquy, 'To be, or not to be. -Hamlet Studies 17.1−2 (Summer/Winter 1995). -p. 10−42.
- Bimiett, Mark Thomton. 'For they are actions that a man might play': Hamlet as Trickster. Hamlet. Ed. Peter J. Smith and Nigel Wood. Theory in Practice. -Buckingham: Open UP, 1996. -p.24−54.
- Byles, Joanna Montgomery. Tragic Alternatives: Eros and Superego Revenge in Hamlet. New Essays on Hamlet. Ed. Mark Thomton Bumett and John Manning. Hamlet Collection 1. -New York: AMS, 1994. -p. 117−34.
- Campbell, Lily Bess. Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes: Slaves of Passion. — Cambridge 1930.-p.217 p. New York 1952. — 227 p.
- Campbell, Dowling G. The Double Dichotomy and Paradox of Honor in Hamlet: With Possible Imagery and Rhetorical Sources for the SoKloquies. -Hamlet Studies 23 (2001).-p. 13−49. ««.
- Cannon, Charles. As in a Theater: Hamlet in the Light of Calvin’s Doctrine of Predestination. -Studies in Engslish Literature 1500−1900.11.1971.-p. 203−22.
- Cefalu, Paul A. 'Damned Custom. .. Habits Devil': Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Anti-Dualism, and the Early Modem Philosophy of Mind. -ELH 67 (2000). -p.: 399−431.
- Clemen, W.H. The Imagery of Hamlet. In Shakespeare: Modem Essays in Criticism. Leonard F. Dean, ed. -New York: Oxford University Press, 1957, rptd. 1968.-P.222−236.
- Coyle, Martin. Hamlet, Gertrude and the Ghost: The Punishment of Women in Renaissance Drama. — Q/W/E/R/T/Y 6 (Oct. 1996). -p. 29−38.
- Craig, Hardin. Hamlet as a Man of Action. -Huntington Library Quaterly 27. 1964.-P.229−37.
- Davis, Arthur. Hamlet and the Eternal Problem of Man. N.Y. 1964. — 135 p
- De Grazia, Margreta. «Hamlet Before Its Time.» -Modem Language Quarterly 62.4 (Dec. 2001). -p.355−75.
- De Grazia, Margreta. Weeping For Hecuba. Historicism, Psychoanalysis, and Early Modem Culture. Ed. Carla Mazzio and Douglas Trevor. Culture Work. -New York: Routledge, 2000.-p. 350−75.
- DeLuca- Diana Macintyre. The Movements of the Ghost in «Hamlet». — Shakespeare Quaterly 24.1973. -p. 147−54. * r
- Dessen, Alan Hamlet’s Poisoned Sword: A Study in Dramatic Imagery. Shakespeare Studies 5.1969.-p.53−69.
- Dews, С L. Bamey. Gender Tragedies: East Texas Cockfighting and Hamlet. — Journal of Men’s Studies 2 (1994). -p. 253−67.
- Dickson, Lisa. The Hermeneutics of Error: Reading and the First Witness in Hamlet. — Hamlet Studies 19.1−2 (SummerAVinter 1997). -p. 64−77.
- DiMatteo, Anthony. Hamlet as Fable: Reconstructing a Lost Code of Meaning. -Connotations 6.2 (1996/1997). -p. 158−79.
- Draper, John W. The Hamlet of Shakespeare’s Audience. -Octagon Books 1970.-187 p.
- Edelman, Charles. 'The very cunning of the scene': Claudius and the Mousetrap. -Parergon 12 (1994). -p.15−25.
- Eliot, T.S. Hamlet and his Problems. In: The Sacred Wood: Essays an Poetry * and Criticism. -L., 1920. -p. 95−103.
- Elliott, George Roy. Scourge and Minister: A Study of «Hamlet» as Tragedy of RevengefuUness and Justice. -Durham, N.C. 1951. -113 p.
- Engle, Lars. Discourse, Agency, and Therapy in Hamlet. -Exemplaria 4 (1992): -p.441−53.
- Faber, M. D. Hamlet and the Inner World of Objects. The Undiscovered Country: New Essays on Psychoanalysis and Shakespeare. Ed. B. J. Sokol. -London: Free Assn., 1993. -p.57−90.
- Fendt, Gene. Is Hamlet a Religious Drama? An Essay on a Question in Kierkegaard. Marquette Studies in Philosophy 21. -Milwaukee: Marquette UP, 1999. p.27−41.
- Findlay, Alison. Hamlet: A Document in Madness. New Essays on Hamlet. Ed. Mark Thomton Burnett and John Manning. Hamlet Collection 1. -New York: AMS, 1994.-P.189−205.
- Finkelstein, Richard. Differentiating Hamlet: Ophelia and the Problems of Subjectivity. -Renaissance and Reformation 21.2 (Spring 1997). -p.5−22.
- Fischer, Philip. Thinking About Killing: Hamlet and the Paths Among the Passions. -Raritan 11 (1991). -p.43−77. '^ 132. Foakes, R.A. The Reception of Hamlet. -Shakespeare Survey 45(1993).-p.l-13.
- Fergusson, Francis. The Idea of a Theater: A Study of Ten Plays. -Princeton 1949.-217 p.
- Fisch, Harold. Hamlet and the Word: The Covenant Pattem in Shakespeare. N.Y.1971.-117p.
- Flatter, PUchard. Hamlet’s Father.L., 1949.-257 p.
- Forker, Charles. Shakespeare’s Theatrical Symbolism and Its Function in * «Hamlet». -Shakespeare Quaterly 14. 1963. -p.215−29.
- Frye, Roland. The Renaissance Hamlet. -Princeton UP 1984.-112 p.
- Gardner, Helen. The Historical Approach: Hamlet. In Shakespeare, the Tragedies: A Collection of Critical Essays. Alfred Harbage, ed. Englewood Cliffs, -N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964. -p.61−70.
- Gibinska, Marta. 'The play’s the thing': The Play Scene in Hamlet. Shakespeare and His Contemporaries: Eastem and Central European Studies. -Newark: U of Delaware P, 1993. -p.175−88,
- Gorfain, PhyUis. Towards a Theory of Play and the Camavalesque in Hamlet» — Hamlet Studies 13 (1991). -p.25−49. Reprinted in Donald Keesey’s Contexts for Criticism (1994) and in Ronald Knowles' Shakespeare and Carnival: After Bakhtin (1998). >^
- Goldman, Michael. «Hamlet: Entering the Text.» Theatre Journal 44 (1992).-p. 449−60.
- Gottschalk, Paul. The Meanings of «Hamlet»: Modes of Literary Inteфretations Since Bradley. -Albuquerque. 1971. — 216 p.
- Grant, William. Hamlet. The Archetypal Structure. -Univ. of Louisville. 2001. — p, 2. (On Polonius as Hamlet’s surrogat father)
- Granville-Barker, Harley. Place Structure and Time Structure. From Prefaces to Shakespeare, Hamlet. -Princeton University Press 1965. -p.535 p
- Dodsworth, Martin. Hamlet Closely Observed. -Athlone, 1985, -124 p.
- Granville-Barker, Harley. Prefaces to Shakespeare. 3d Series: «Hamlet». 1., 1936.-.317p.
- Greenblatt, Stephen. Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton, -N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001.-218 p.
- Habib, bntiaz. Never Doubt I Love: Misreading Hamlet. -College Literature 21.2 (1994).-p.l9−32.
- Halverson, John. The Importance of Horatio. -Hamlet Studies 16 (1994).-p.57−70.
- Hardy, John. Hamlet’s 'Modesty of nature. -Hamlet Studies 16 (1994).-p. 42−56.
- Hart, Jeffrey. «Hamlet's Great Song.» Smiling Through the Cultural Catastrophe: Toward the Revival of Higher Education. By Hart. New Haven: Yale UP, 2001.-p.l69−86.
- Hassel, R, Chris, Jr. 'How infinite in faculties': Hamlet’s Confusion of God and Man. -Literature and Theology 8 (1994).-p. 127−39.
- Hassel, R. Chris, Jr. Mouse and Mousetrap in Hamlet. -Shakespeare-Jahrbuch 135(1999).-p.77−92.
- Hassel, R. Chris, Jr. Painted Women: Annunciation Motifs in Hamlet. — Conparative Drama 32 (1998). -p.47−84.
- Holbrook, Peter. Nietzsche’s Hamlet. -Shakespeare Survey 50 (1997).-p. 171−86.
- Hopkins, Lisa. Parison and the Impossible Comparison. New Essays on Hamlet. Ed. Mark Thomton Burnett and John Manning. Hamlet Collection 1. -New York: AMS, 1994.-p. 153−64.: if
- Hunt, Maurice. Art of Judgement, Art of Compassion: The Two Arts of Hamlet. -Essays in Literature 18 (1991).-p.3−20.
- Hamill, Paul. Death’s Lively Image: The Emblematic Significance of the Closet Scene in «Hamlet». -Texas Studies in Litarature and Language 16. 1974. -p. 249−62.
- Hapgood, Robert. Hamlet Nearly Absurd: The Dramaturgy of Delay. -Tulane Drama Review. 9:4.1965. -p. 132−45.
- Hardison, O.B. The Dramatic Triad in «Hamlet». -Studies in Philology 57. 1960. -p.144−64.
- Havely, Cicely. The Play-Scene in «Hamlef. -Essays in Criticism 23. 1973.- p.217−35.
- Johnston, Arthur. The Player’s Speech in «Hamlet». -Shakespeare Quarterly. 13. 1961.-P.21−30.
- Iwasaki, Soji. Hamlet and Melancholy: An Iconographical Approach. Hamlet and Japan. Ed. Yoshiko Ueno. Hamlet Collection 2. -New York: AMS, 1995. -p.37−55.
- Jenkins, Harold. The Relation Between the Second Quarto and the Folio Text of Hamlet. -Studies in Bibliography, Volume 7 (1955). -p.69−83.
- Johnston, Ian. Introductory Lectures on Shakespeare’s «Hamlet». -Malaspina- •^ University College edition. 2001. -p.2. (On three revengers)
- Jones, Ernest. Hamlet and Oedipus Emest Jones- -L., Norton 1976- -75 p.
- Joseph, Bertram Leon. Conscience and The King: A Study of «Hamlet». -L., 1953.-115 p.
- Jump, J.D. Shakespeare’s «Hamlet». A Casebook. L., 1968. — 112 p.
- ICallay, Geza. 'To be or not to be' and 'Cogito, ergo sum': Thinking and Being in Shakespeare’s Hamlet Against a Cartesian Background. -AnaChronist no vol. 6. (1996).-p.98−123.
- Kawai, Shoichiro. Hamlet’s Imagination. Hamlet and Japan. Ed. Yoshiko Ueno. Hamlet Collection 2. -New York: AMS, 1995. -p.73−85.
- Keman, Alvin. Shakespeare’s Stage Audiences and The Playwright’s Reflections and Control of Audience Response. -George Washington Univ. 1982. -316 p. A V'>
- Keman, Alvin. Shakespeare’s Craft: Eight Lectures. Ed. Phillip H. HighfiU, Jr. Carbondale: Southern Dlinois UP for George Washington University, 1982. — 221 p.
- Kim, Jong-Hwan. Waiting for Justice: Shakespeare’s Hamlet and the Elizabethan Ethics of Revenge English -Language and Literature 43 (1997).-p 781−97.
- Kitto H.D.F. Form and Meaning in Drama: A Study of the Greek Plays and of Hamlet. -Methuen & Co Ltd 1956 -413 p.
- Knowles, Ronald. Hamlet and Counter-Humanism. -Renaissance Quarterly 52 (1999).-p.l046−69.
- Kirschbaum, Leo. Hamlet and Ophelia. -Philological Quarterly 35.1956.-p.375−93.
- Knight, G. Wilson. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, with Three New Essays. -London: Methuen, 1968- -437 p.
- Knights, L.C. An Approach to «Hamlet». -L., 1960. — 317 p.
- Kott, Jan. Hamlet of the Mid-Century. In Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Boleslaw Taborski, trans. Garden City, N.Y. Doubleday, 1964. -p.47−151.
- Kottman, Paul A. Sharing Vision, Interrupting Speech: Hamlet’s Spectacular Community -Shakespeare Studies 36 (1998). -p.29−57.
- Landau, Aaron. 'Let me not burst in ignorance': Skepticism and Anxiety in Hamlet. -English Studies 82.3 (June 2001). -p.218−30.
- Lawrence, Sean Kevin. 'As a stranger, bid it welcome': Alterity and Ethics in Hamlet and the New Historicism. -European Journal of English 4.2 (2000) -^.155−69.
- Lavender, Andy. Hamlet in Pieces: Shakespeare Reworked: Peter Brook, Robert 1. ePage, Robert Wilson. -New York: Continuum, 2001. -189 p.
- Lewis, C.S. Death in Hamlet, bi Shakespeare, the Tragedies: A Collection of Critical Essays. Alfred Harbage, ed. Englewood Cliffs. -N.J.: Prentice- Hall, 1964.71−74.
- Lidz, Theodore. Hamlet’s Enemy: Madness and Myth in Hamlet. -New York: Basic Books, 1975.-78 p.
- Leavenworth, Russel. Mterpretning «Hamlet»: Materials for Analysis. San Francisco. 1960.-319 p.
- Levin, Harry. The Antic Disposition. -Shakespeare-Jahrbuch 94.1958. -p. 175−90.
- Levin, Harry. The Question of «Hamlet». -N.Y.1959. -287 p. ГЦ
- Levin, Налу. An Eзфlications of the Player’s Speech. -L., 2003. (on Player as Hecuba)
- Levin, Richard. The Multiple Plot in English and Renaissance Drama. -Univ. of Chicago Press, (on structure and composition). 1971. — 219 p.
- Lewis, Clive Staples. Hamlet: The Prince or the Poem? -Proceedings of the British Academy 28.1942.-p. 139−54.
- Levy, Eric P. Defeated Joy: Melancholy and Eudaemonia in Hamlet -Upstart Crow 18 (1998).-p 95−109.
- Levy, Eric P. 'Nor th' exterior nor the inward man': The Problematics of Personal Identity in Hamlet. -University of Toronto Quarterly 68.3 (Summer 1999): -p.711−27.
- Levy, Eric. The Problematic Relation Between Reason and Emotion in Hamlet.- Renascence 53.2 (Winter 2001).-p.83−95.
- Levy, Eric P. 'Things standing thus unknown': The Epistemology of Ignorance in Hamlet. -Studies in Philology 97 (Spring 2000). -p. 192−209.
- Lewis, C.S. Hamlet The Prince or the Poem? -Proceedings of the British Academy xxxviii, 1942.
- Long, Michael. The Unnnatural Scene. A Study in Shakespearian Tragedy. -L., 1976. -p. 156−57. (On Player’s speech and Hamlet)
- Low, Antiiony. «Hamlet and the Ghost of Purgatory: Intimations of Killing the Father.-EngUsh Literary Renaissance 29.3(Autumn 1999).-p.443−67.
- Low, Jennifer. Manhood and the Duel: Enacting Masculinity in Hamlet. — Centennial Review 43.3 (Fall 1999). -p. 1−12.
- Lucking, David. 'Each word made true and good': Narrativity in Hamlet. — Dalhouse Review 76 (1996). -p.77−96.
- Mack, Maynard. The World of Hamlet. -Yale Review 41.1952.-p.502−23.
- Mack, Maynard. Killing the King: Three Studies in Shakespeare’s Tragic Structure. New Haven 1973.-147 p.
- Mallette, Richard. From Gyves to Graces: Hamlet and Free Will. -Journal of English and German Philology 93 (1994).-p. 336−55. '^.
- Malone, Cynthia Northcutt. Framing in Hamlet. -College Literature 18.1 (Feb. 1991).-p. 50−63.
- Malone, Kemp. The Literary History of Hamlet: The Early Tradition. -New York, Haskell House, 1964. -327 p.
- McGuire, Philip C. Bearing «A Wary eye»: Ludic Vengeance and Doubtflil Suicide in Hamlet From Page to Performance: Essays in Early English Drama. Ed. John Alford. East Lansing: -Michigan State UP, 1995. -p.235−53.
- Motohashi, Tetsuya. The play’s the ting … of nothing: Writing and «the liberty» in Hamlet». Hamlet and Japan. Ed. Yoshiko Ueno. -Hamlet Collection 2. New York: AMS, 1995. -p.103−118.
- McConnell, Heron. Hamlet and Revenge. An essay. -L., 2001. (on Hamlet’s and 1. aertes' psychological motifs for revenge)
- Mehl, Dieter. Die Pantomime im Drama der Shakespearezeit: Ein Beitrag zur Gegenwart der Dumb Show. Heidelberg 1964. -213 p.
- Mercer, Peter. Hamlet: The Acting of Revenge. -Univ. of Iowa Press 1987 -116p.
- Miller, Robert. Venus, Adonis and the Horses. -ELH. 1952. XDC. -p.255. (on «conditional parallelism», an inserted play indicates what would be the nature of the main story, if the central character — Hamlet — were differently constituted.
- Milne, Joseph. Hamlet: The Conflict Between Fate and Grace. -Hamlet Studies 18.1−2 (Summer/Winter 1996).-p.29−48.
- MoUin, Alfred. On Hamlet’s MousetrEq). -Interpretation 21.3 Spring 1994.-p.353−72.
- Morin, Gertrude. Depression and Narrative Thinking: A Cognitive Approach to Hamlet. -Mosaic 25.1 (1992).-p.l-12.
- Moulton, RG. Shakespeare as a Dramatic Artist. 3d ed. -Oxford, -p.43−89.
- Muir, Kenneth and Stanley Wells. Aspects of Hamlet: Articles Reprinted from Shakespeare Survey. -Cambridge- New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979. -344p.
- Muir, Kenneth. Shakespeare: Hamlet. N-Y: Barron’s Educational Series, 1963.-236.
- Muir, K. Shakespeare the Professional and Releated Studies. L., 1972. -218 p.
- Muir, Kenneth. The Sources of Shakespeare’s Plays. -New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978. (Chapt. 24, -pp. 158−169) Jt •ч